ill logic

Wizbang delves into the sewer of the liberal "mind"set:

1. Under the terms of his 1991 surrender, Saddam agreed to surrender all his existing Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), all his research into developing more WMDs, and foreswear further pursuit of WMDs.
2. WMDs are defined as nuclear (including radiological) weapons, biological weapons, and chemical weapons.
3. Neither Bush nor any of his representatives ever said definitively that Saddam possessed WMDS. They said that his lack of cooperation and other actions made it very likely he was acting to conceal them, but never made conclusive statements.
4. Chemical weapons are defined as non-nuclear, non-biological weapons that kill through a chemical process other than combustion.
5. Poison gas, as it kills through a chemical process other than combustion, is considered a chemical weapon.
6. Between 700 and 800 weapons containing poison gas have been discovered in Iraq.
7. Saddam had control of 6.5 tons of uranium dioxide that could easily have been converted to use in nuclear or radiological weapons.
   

What do the moonbats conclude from all this evidence?

Bush lied about Saddam having WMDs!

(slightly edited and expanded)