Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Lileks' mistake

As much as I like practically everything James Lileks writes (Bleats, Backfence, Newhouse, Joe Ohio, the list goes on...), he's mistaken in thinking that facts point to evolution. He makes a good conclusion, however, that "we could avoid conflict if teachers felt free to lead the class in philosophical speculations". That's all that we are asking for in the first place - the right to discuss rational alternatives to the cult of Darwinism.

UPDATE: Proverbs Daily says the debate is important.

2 comments:

sackofcatfood said...

"rational alternatives"? But wouldn't that encourage dangerous things like free-thinking and forming one's own conclusions?

Hatless in Hattiesburg said...

ach! what was i thinking by thinking?