Tuesday, March 04, 2008

leaders? leaders? we don' need no steenkin leaders!

dustbury shows us a view from the porch:
Folks, we have a serious perception problem in this country. A bunch of people seem to think we have "leaders" instead of "representatives". Bosses and not employees.

Folks, we hired them. We pay them. They work for you, not the other way around. If you are sitting around and waiting for leadership from this collection of do-gooders, used car salesmen, and former Student Body Treasurers, you might as well wait for Santa while you're at it.

These are the people we hire to schlep out our legislative trash in Washington, DC because we're too busy being, you know, productive to handle scutwork like that. We've given them a metaphorical Roto-Rooter and asked them to keep the navigable waterways clear; handed them a calculator and asked them to keep an eye on the national checking account. And, like a sixteen year-old left home with a simple list of chores who instead gets into the liquor cabinet and invites her friends over for a party, look what's happened to them.

Folks, if you want "Political Leaders" you're living in the wrong country; the closest provision we have for a "Political Leader" in the Constitution is the guy we hire to mind the Army & Navy and shake hands with foreigners for us. This is the country where we're supposed to be leading ourselves, not waiting for solutions to be handed down from on high. Your representatives are supposed to be representing you, hence the name. They are not the legislative equivalent of grenades, where you pull the electoral pin, lob them towards Washington, and hope they go off the way you expected. They're your employees; you need to tell them what to do and keep an eye on them, or they'll be stealing the petty cash and spending their whole shift leaning on a broom handle and slacking off.

Don't wait to be led.

5 comments:

The Local Malcontent said...

Give us some good news tonight, Texas!

Hatless in Hattiesburg said...

well, i did what i could, given the choices...

Dr. Bob said...

[ This is the country where we're supposed to be leading ourselves, not waiting for solutions to be handed down from on high. ]

Uh, Hatless? I for one can think of at least one entire political party that is based on the principle of waiting for things to be handed down from on high... should I be nervous yet?

;o/

Hatless in Hattiesburg said...

we should be nervous that both parties are just selling us slight variations of fdr's totalitarian state, and obliterating our option to have the kind of freedom that our founding fathers had in mind.

The Local Malcontent said...

I very heartily agree with your last comment, Hatless--

May God help us, here in the America I only remember--